The tragic bureaucracy of academics teaching entrepreneurship
You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war
which I would apply in the context of entrepreneurship
You cannot simultaneously prevent and create bureaucracy
and in education
You cannot simultaneously make a student dependent and independent
yet universities seem to try to do both. I think professors feel too much incentive to create programs, centers, and institutes to stop themselves.
I’ve seen professors and administrators spend years chasing government grants, leading students to chase government grants, to create centers and institutes of entrepreneurship, never mentioning anything about customers or sales. In those years, I didn’t see them actually help students. Their plan was to create the entrepreneurial program first, then work with the students.
I’ve seen professors and administrators, meaning to promote entrepreneurship, plan how to get big companies to come to campus to give internships to undergraduates — not giving the students skills to find openings themselves, let alone to create them. If that plan still sounds entrepreneurial enough, those same people in the same meeting lamented the resources it took to hire an outside team to update their project’s web page — at an engineering school.
Let me restate: professors and administrators wanted outside companies to hire students to make them entrepreneurial, while they didn’t hire students for projects at their own school!
Why should an outside company hire students you yourself don’t consider for work that you train them for? Do you trust your own students? Do you trust your own curriculum? Students working on their school’s projects affects themselves. You can give them work they care about. If they can’t deliver, you can find flaws in your curriculum. You can save time and money and improve your program!
I’ve seen rooms full of students listening to seminars for how to spend months chasing government money to learn to develop research ideas into entrepreneurial projects. Sounds interesting at first, but the practice involves working on the schedules of the programs, not of customers, the market, or the potential entrepreneurs. A lot of the government money would go to flying the team to remote places, housing them, paying speakers, and overhead unrelated to entrepreneurship, even opposed to it.
Meanwhile, many applicants don’t win and now wasted their time learning anti-entrepreneurial behaviors that the schools and government taught.
I don’t oppose government programs, but Einstein’s quote and my paraphrases resonate, looking at the resources taken from the economy and then spent creating bureaucracy.
I understand that people created some ways to teach entrepreneurship, but they seem to have grown them in bureaucratic, anti-entrepreneurial ways, which results in them creating bureaucratic, anti-entrepreneurial programs.
How do I know? Because people who took those programs look at my courses and tell me they see what those programs missed.
Because my students win their business-plan contests, even when I tell them not to get distracted by programs unrelated to their customers and markets. I believe they win because they don’t let themselves be distracted.
Because graduates of my entrepreneurship course tell me they outsell professional salespeople, using the techniques in my courses, without taking a sales course. I guarantee the government programs don’t teach students to hustle like that.
It may seem melodramatic, but their work reminds me of the opening of Howl:
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked,
dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix.
Read my weekly newsletter
On initiative, leadership, the environment, and burpees
2 responses on “The tragic bureaucracy of academics teaching entrepreneurship”