Robert Litterman
Bob Litterman is a founding partner of Kepos Capital and the Chairman of its Risk Committee. Before founding Kepos Capital in 2010, he enjoyed a 23-year career at Goldman Sachs & Co., where he served in research, risk management, investment, and thought leadership roles.
He researched and published groundbreaking papers in asset allocation and risk management during his tenure at Goldman Sachs. He is co-developer of the Black-Litterman Global Asset Allocation Model.
Bob serves on a number of boards, Ceres, Climate Central, Climate Leadership Council, Niskanen Center, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, UCAR (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research), Woodwell Climate Research Center, World Wildlife Fund. He is also currently serving on the FSOC Climate-Related Financial Risk Advisory Committee.
He holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Minnesota and a B.S. in Human Biology from Stanford University.
Kepos Capital, founded in 2010, is a registered investment adviser based in New York City. They manage over $2 billion in assets for a global, institutional investor base. Their investment strategies span from systematic macro to carbon transition and carbon allowance markets. Their models seek to deliver returns that are lowly correlated to broad market indices and other investment programs, and they continually evaluate and improve their process in response to new findings, changes in market conditions, and industry competition.
701: Robert Litterman, part 2: “We need legislation, we need a price on carbon.”
You won’t hear many finance people promoting more taxes, though it’s increasing. Bob talks beyond our conversation a few weeks before about a carbon tax, integrity, permanence, standards, measurement, and many different angles. He talks about responsibility and holding the companies creating the problems responsible. It just takes courage.
Regular listeners know I find that when anyone focuses only on carbon, greenhouse emissions, and climate, they almost always miss our other environmental problems, like plastic, pollution, deforestation, and you know the rest, Bob agrees the tax incentive should apply to these other areas, though I’m not sure he acts on them. It’s easy not to change the system, but to make it more efficient and accelerate it overall, even if you lower problems in one part of the system.
But mostly I wanted to hear his views and strategies, not press, so I hope I listened more than challenge.
He also shared his inside views of people in finance approaching a tipping point of realizing we have to protect our environment — everything, not just climate.
699: Robert Litterman, part 1: A Carbon Tax and Managing Risk
I met Bob at a conference on climate at my old school, Columbia Business School. He knew another participant, Gernot Wagner, with whom I recorded an episode I’ll post soon, and was a peer with past guest Mark Tercek. I didn’t work in finance, but I understand Bob and Mark were like deities there.
Bob brings two huge new things to climate (he talks about climate almost exclusively among our environmental problems, though we touch on others briefly in the conversation). First, he knows risk management. Most of his career, he didn’t think much about the environment, but when he learned about it, he identified that we have to manage risk, so he dove into the issue.
Second, he connected with a group of conservative politicians promoting what he sees as the most effective solution: a carbon tax. That he’s working with groups normally seen as resisting climate action could bring people together.
Also, just after we recorded, the New York Times published a big piece on Bob: A Renowned Economist’s New Idea for Stopping Climate Change.
A personal note: I don’t challenge his views because I’m learning them and meeting him. I agree our economic system doesn’t account for pollution and depletion. Without proper accounting, no business can stay in business that long, nor can any government. So I consider proper accounting essential, but it’s only extrinsic. It doesn’t change our culture or the values driving it. Since our culture has abandoned, at least regarding how we treat each other when mediated through the environment, Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You, Live and Let Live, and Leave It Better Than You Found It, a tax won’t fix a values problem.
I didn’t challenge Bob in it in our conversation, but I find when people focus on climate and greenhouse emissions they nearly always “solve” them with “whack-a-mole” ideas that increase biodiversity loss, deforestation, and other problems. They claim they’re solving one thing at a time, but I see them not addressing the culture causing everything.
I look forward to more conversations with him.