Fitness

Following up my series on liberating ourselves from moralists, meddlers, and others who want to impose their subjective values on us in the name of objective truth in the realm of food, let's continue with animal rights, the next on my list of a few days ago. I confess I don't know much about animal rights, so I won't say much today. I distinguish between reasons not to eat meat based in animal rights from reasons based in animal cruelty. The former seems to propose a set of rules for people to follow. The latter seems based on an individual's personal feelings. As I understand animal rights, people don't suggest giving animals legal rights, like to sue or vote. I understand the concept of animals…

Following up my series on liberating ourselves from moralists, meddlers, and others who want to impose their subjective values on us in the name of objective truth in the realm of food, let's continue with environmental reasons since I listed it next on my list a few days ago. People who don't eat meat often point out that eating meat pollutes the environment significantly more than not eating meat. As far as I know the data overwhelmingly supports this conclusion. I've heard people who eat meat argue that eating meat pollutes less, but I've never heard one of their arguments hold water in the least. They generally forget or neglect something obvious like that animals eat food too. I'm open to hearing something I missed,…

Following up yesterday's post on liberating ourselves from moralists, meddlers, and others who want to impose their subjective values on us in the name of objective truth, let's start with health since I listed it as the first non-issue two days ago. First, nobody chooses what they eat solely for health, so claiming to eat meat or not as a wholesale policy based on health is a red herring. Next, let's look at what I claim is a typical example of someone claiming health as a foundation for eating meat or not. This example goes one way, but it ones in the other direction go the same. In graduate school I knew a guy who claimed eating meat was necessary for life. We had a…

People spout tremendous nonsense on why people should or shouldn't eat meat. My next several posts will point out flaws in their reasoning. I think in the echo chambers of their minds, people come to believe their reasons for eating or not eating meat are grounded in absolute truth. Or they only talk with people who agree with them, while arguing positionally with people who don't, a recipe for confirming and firming one's beliefs more firmly, no matter how wrong they are. I speak, of course, from now-humble experience, having spewed nonsense myself, trying to convince others of the unhealthiness of eating meat. No more. I don't claim to know what's right, but I can tell you some things that are wrong. My goal is…

Yesterday I mentioned I didn't eat meat for two categories of reasons: taste and intellectual reasons. Today I'll cover my intellectual reasons. Intellectual You know what? None. Now that I think of it, no intellectual reasons motivate my eating habits. Everything I think of that seems not based in taste, when I peel away at it, turns out based in taste. I expect your reasons ultimately are based in taste too. You can tell your reasons aren't objective because other people disagree with you. I mean, maybe you're right and they're wrong, but they say the same about you, so I'll stick with my conclusion. See my next few posts on non-issues to see why I don't find your reason objectively true. Non-issues Here are…

Why I don't eat meat differs from why I stopped eating meat, though the reasons overlap in matters of taste. As I mentioned, I lived over half my life since I stopped eating meat and, as you might expect, my reasons changed. The main reasons for the changes were realizing that I found no objective reason for eating meat or not. I've looked and they all turn out subjective. People have suggested lots of reasons for eating meat or not and none of them have been objective either. All reasons boil down to matters of taste and belief. If people disagree on their reasons, the reasons probably aren't based in objective truth. People claim their reasons are objective, but I don't find someone saying they…

Yesterday covered more the physical side of the change in the trucker's life with food. Today let's look more at the emotional side. The movie showed that, however ingrained the punishment of "food" and its related confusion-based helplessness, just a few days of new experience can overcome it. The trucker's physical health didn't change overnight, but his emotional health did. And a major point of this blog is the fundamental importance of emotions in changing your life. Once he found that food -- something so simple as food -- could create power (ability to influence his life), joy, reward, and so on, he found he could create something to live for, which I believe was a better life for himself, spending time with his family…