Leadership


The five greatest flaws I see in environmentalism

I see environmentalism increasingly causing environmental degradation because the core of its practice is misguided. I started this post to write about the two greatest flaws I see in environmentalism, but three more came to me while writing. My goal is not to be comprehensive or authoritative but to provoke thought and behavior change. To believe that suing more solar, wind, or any energy source, including nuclear or, should it ever work, fusion, will lower use of fossil fuels or uranium, or their resulting pollution and depletion. Corollary: To believe that calling solar, wind, or any energy source as implemented today "clean," "green," or "renewable" means that it is clean, green, or renewable. I propose recognizing instead that only reducing pollution, depletion, use of fossil…

0 Comments

NYU’s president breaks NYU’s rules, to pollute and deplete of course

I wrote in 2023 about NYU consistently violating its own rules in NYU in 2019: We will stop buying bottled water. NYU in 2023: Here’s some bottled water from us. It's tempting to read something I'm not writing. I'm talking about leadership, which requires credibility and integrity, which require hands-on practical experience, not mere talk. I'm not writing in judgment. During a bus boycott, Martin Luther King would undermine everything if he occasionally took the bus, or even once, even if it took him places faster than any other way and he could do more with that extra time than anyone else. I attended a wonderful event hosted by NYU this week. The prominent author Walter Isaacson spoke about his book on the Declaration of Independence…

0 Comments

Most people don’t realize how much stupid stuff they do every day that they consider critical

The title says it all, but it bears repeating: "Most people don't realize how much stupid stuff they do every day that they consider critical" I've been meaning to write this post for a while. People constantly say how busy they are, often as an excuse not to do something meaningful. As best I can tell, most people today don't know their values enough to know how to choose to act on their values and create meaning in their lives over acting in ways to entertain them and deliver short-term reward but nothing or less-than-nothing in the long term. Coaching clients and workshop participants find that the exercises bring them more free time and save them money, even though those results aren't the main goal.…

0 Comments

Environmentalists rarely try to solve the problem

Fixing the results of a problem is not the same as stopping it from recurring and you rarely can undo all the problems, especially if you do it persistently. For example, exercising doesn't make up for an addiction to doof. Even if you burn off the calories, it doesn't fix the health problems or make back the wasted money. More importantly, since you keep consuming doof, you'll likely miss exercising sometimes. Relevant to polluting and depleting: plant all the trees you want. If our culture values affordable houses and food, when they want to chop your trees back down, they'll find a way to. I distinguish mopping up the mess from not causing it because I'm getting flooded with requests for people promoting stuff for…

0 Comments

I Challenge You to Find an Environmentalist Who Doesn’t Argue Against Sustainability

I just returned from another event by environmentalists. As usual, they promote climate most, mainly through emissions, but also through ESG and DEI. As usual, they promote anything but sustainability. When they talked about circular economy stuff, they talk about mining waste streams, but not ending nonrenewable inputs. When they talk about plastic, they talk about increasing recycling rates, but not that its mere production creates pollution that we have no way of rending benign, not now nor in any plan on any meaningful level. You get the picture. They usually talk in bubbles that don't challenge that they lack a vision to reach sustainability. Many of their proposals don't help and often accelerate problems or at least distract from actually reaching sustainability by leading…

0 Comments

Did Paul Ehrlich Help or Hurt His Cause?

Paul Ehrlich died two weeks ago. I read The Population Bomb a while ago and heard him speak in many interviews. I recently listened again to a few recordings of his and read a few articles of him. In each he was speaking to people who liked him and agreed with him so he spoke freely. In each he called people who disagreed with him "idiots" or something like "people who can't count to twenty without taking their shoes off." He wasn't perfect. Nobody is, but though he acknowledged he was wrong on some points, he didn't take responsibility for mistakes. He just said that he would be right in the long run. He didn't acknowledge that he didn't take huge factors that would affect…

0 Comments

Something important missing in my life

I was talking to a coaching client about leadership, which works with people's intrinsic motivations. Since our greatest motivations and passions tend to be our greatest vulnerabilities, we tend to protect ourselves by hiding them. A challenge, then, for the leader who wants to go beyond just managing, beyond just leading, to inspire people, is to learn their deepest motivations, which they often protect the most. I was working with the client on how to make people feel comfortable sharing their vulnerabilities. As much as we protect them, since they are passions we care about, we want to share them... as long as we feel the person we're talking to will support us, not judge us, make fun of us, manipulate us, or otherwise use…

0 Comments

I searched “comprehensive list of environmental solutions.” No wonder everyone feels hopeless and gives up.

I searched "comprehensive list of environmental solutions." The results search results showed nothing meaningful or helpful. Before continuing, I should point out what prompted that search was writing my next book, which does present a solution, not only to our environmental problems, but to things that result from it, such as corruption, tyranny, racism, addiction, despair, and more. So I don't feel despair or anxiety from pointing out that not one proposed solution nor combination of them so far presented in the media solves our problems, at least that I know of, including from the search above. I think everyone can tell they don't work. Even the people proposing them know they don't work and will likely never work. That's why ardent environmentalists don't try…

0 Comments

Can you help me understand how liberals and progressives view leadership?

I grew up in liberal, progressive households and I don't remember everything of how I viewed leadership, but I'm pretty sure I viewed it skeptically. Well, when Martin Luther King or Gandhi did it, it seemed inspirational, but when I considered doing it, I shied away. I'm trying to remember how I viewed it because I work with a lot of people who are liberal and progressive and they shy away from leading people. More than shy away, they seem to sabotage themselves from improving at it. They seem to shun it as something unseemly. I think they view it as coercive, like "If I do something that leads someone to do something they wouldn't have otherwise, I must be coercing them without their consent."…

0 Comments

Do people who fear learning to lead think it means imposing hierarchy?

A friend calls leadership "the l-word." I used to think of leadership as not something anyone could learn. I thought you either had it or you didn't. I also associated it with control. Today I associate it with help, support, empathy, compassion, listening, awareness, and social and emotional skills like them. It's been so long since I associated it with control, I have to work to reconnect with that feeling so it takes work for me to empathize with someone who describes it as "the l-word." I mean, when I was little we used "the f-word" to describe the worst curse word, which rhymes with duck. Today, "the n-word" seems the most taboo word to say or write, at least for people who aren't African-American.…

0 Comments

Dr. Larry Arnn on Churchill on technology and modern life

I recently finished Hillsdale College's course on Churchill, hosted by the school's president, Dr. Larry Arnn. If you don't know, the school is as conservative as schools get. Arnn is also on the board of the Heritage Foundation, also as conservative as they come. Both institutions support policies and activities that pollute and deplete. To my mind, activities that pollute and deplete deprive people of life, liberty, and property without due process of law and violate the principle of the consent of the governed---that is, they violate the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. People at those institutions haven't seen that problem yet, as far as I can tell, but it looks like they violate their values. A different, though similar, violation appeared to Churchill.…

0 Comments

Have you thought about sanitation systems? They violate ideals of the left and right. They are socialist *and* imperialist.

Americans are divided over health care. Since everyone knows about the controversy there, I'll share some properties about it, then connect to sanitation. For comparison: health care People on the left want socialized health care. Everyone gets sick, no one wants to, so to them it makes politically, morally, and economically to provide health care to all. It spreads out the costs no one wants to pay but everyone has to. People on the right want a free, competitive market. Health care is a service. It benefits from people developing new technologies, drugs, ways to provide service, and other things that free markets develop best. People on the left fear that a free market with lead to monopolies, price gouging, oversupply of health care to…

0 Comments

Listening is sharpening your axe

The playing field of leadership is the other person's emotional system and situation. The more you know them, the more you can lead and inspire them. The challenge is that people's greatest motivations tend to be their greatest vulnerabilities, so we tend to protect them instead of sharing them. Thus it helps to listen, but many people who want to accomplish things tend toward action. Acting or prompting others to act rarely leads people to lower their protections and share their vulnerabilities. You've probably heard the saying, often mis-attributed to Abraham Lincoln, "If I had four hours to chop down a tree, I’d spend the first two hours sharpening the axe." It says that preparation for action helps, and often the more the better. I've…

0 Comments

Democracy, wedge issues, and calm

People's language and emotions get intense around wedge issues like abortion, gun rights, and tax levels. One side says the other wants to control women's bodies, the other says the one wants to kill babies. Such characterizations, mischaracterizations, and seeing the other from your view not theirs makes finding common ground nearly impossible. I call this pattern the worst problem in the world. Yet we have to live together. Secession didn't work so well in 1861. That's at the national level. At the individual level, if we can't talk calmly to our neighbors or think calmly, we can't become calm in the rest of life. Being angry all the time, or being stuck in emotions in that direction, doesn't make for a fulfilling life. My…

2 Comments

One of the most important statements of environmentalism: giving up on changing culture (and what to do instead)

I enjoyed reading Bill McKibben's latest book Here Comes the Sun. I found much of it well researched. Still, I don't think it made clear what I consider its starting point. Before you read the critical stuff I start with about the book, I end on a high note. I've written many times how tools like technology, market incentives, and legislation aren't good or bad. They implement and augment the values of the people and culture wielding them. As long as our culture rewards behaviors that pollute and deplete, it will bend the use of any tool to accelerate itself. Whatever your intent with, say, solar panels, if you don't change culture, however much solar panels decrease emissions in one area, overall, they will enable…

0 Comments

Differences between environmentalists’ strategies and mine

I've been increasingly realizing and pointing out that I am not an environmentalist. I surprised myself to discover it. I had long felt misunderstood when people asked, “If you like nature so much, why don't you go to the woods live in nature?” It had long been obvious to me that we needed to change culture, not escape it, and New York is an influential cultural center. Then I checked and in 2014, shortly before my first experiment in acting sustainably of avoiding packaged food for a week, in a post in this blog entitled The Great Pacific Garbage Patch and the world we live in, I wrote, "The issue is not how other people think about us or trends. Polluting means hurting people. Dirty…

0 Comments
Lincoln didn’t heal slaves’ wounds. He led their “owners” to stop owning them. I’m following Lincoln, and then some.
The United States Constitution

Lincoln didn’t heal slaves’ wounds. He led their “owners” to stop owning them. I’m following Lincoln, and then some.

Our environmental problems are symptoms. I won't fight people trying to protect and conserve nature, but the degradation of nature isn't the problem. Restoring an old growth forest doesn't change that billions of people are acting in ways to cut down whatever is restored. Many times I've described how the suffering and death we and our culture is causing is orders of magnitude times greater than slavery, so I won't hesitate describing what I'm doing in terms of slavery. Also, while I value nature, we have laws to protect people, not as much to protect nature. Many environmentalists point out that since we're all connected, protecting wildlife is protecting humans. It works the other way too: protecting humans means protecting wildlife, since protecting humans means…

0 Comments

Climate Week NYC: Slimy and Duplicitous, causing the problems they complain about.

Climate Week NYC was a month or so ago, but its sliminess lingers. I'm writing this post not to complain, but to call attention for the need for leadership, integrity, and credibility. I saw none there, but huge demand for it. I haven't engaged yet with the event planners so attended passively, therefore include myself in showing no leadership there. It's further motivation to finish my next book, which will be my platform for taking responsibility and leading. In the meantime, people act performatively---that is, as if they were helping, but doing nothing effective, or more often counterproductive. Take, for example, the first thing on display at one of the main events, a race car. Is the idea that its being electric means it helps?…

0 Comments

Hear my second time on the Heritage Foundation podcast The Power Hour with Jack Spencer

It's been close to a year since I first appeared on the Heritage Foundation's podcast The Power Hour, hosted by Jack Spencer, who has been a guest on my podcast three times. First, I enjoy Jack's hosting both as a guest and a listener. I really was laughing as hard as I said when I came on. You'll hear me share more about how America's founders, Lincoln, Adam Smith, and other Enlightendigenous thinkers inform my views and actions. To my credit, I think I convey important thinking about sustainability based on what we need for society to work. It won't work if anyone can just do what they want. Roles for government include ensuring the consent of the governed and protecting people's life, liberty, and…

0 Comments

Abolitionists didn’t free slaves by teaching children that slavery was wrong. Yes, they taught children, but they freed slaves by freeing slaves.

I've written that, yes, we should teach children about living sustainably, but teaching children doesn't solve the problems we're teaching them about. On the contrary, if we teach them to do what we aren't doing ourselves, they learn from our behavior, not our words. We will lead them to see polluting and depleting like cursing or drinking, something kids have to wait until they grow up to do but that is okay for adults to do as long as they mostly hide it from kids. I put it in the frame of smoking in my post Don’t “teach children sustainability”. Here’s why and what to do instead. I also wrote How environmentalists are like smokers who tell others not to smoke … while smoking. Today…

0 Comments

Tik Tok and Instagram or hands-on practical experience?

Two things I haven't kept track of but happen over and over: People saying, "Your material is great! You should promote it more on Tik Tok, Instagram, etc to make it available to more people." Me saying, "Leadership requires credibility and integrity, which require hands-on practical experience." Sure, I could go for the quick clicks as the guy off the grid in Manhattan. I could probably get a million followers, but to change global culture, continuing the legacy of Abraham Lincoln, requires a solid, deep foundation. I'm getting closer to launch all the time, but not there yet. The reason my material has value and meaning and that there is so much of it is that I'm not going for the quick clicks, which would…

0 Comments

My top thought about Climate Week

With a podcast and book on sustainability leadership, I've been invited to many events at so-called Climate Week. It's when people fly from all over the world to talk about what other people should do. I wrote the following as constructive criticism. It's what I would expect people who take personal responsibility for how their actions affect others would want to know. My top thought is surprise, even as jaded as I am about so-called environmentalists: Everyone I heard speak, when they talk about polluters, they talk as if it's different people than themselves. This makes no sense. They are among the greatest polluters on the planet, who have ever lived. Why do they act like the big polluters are other people? It bears repeating:…

0 Comments

“Do the reps, you get the results. Don’t do the reps, you don’t get the results.”

I've been saying these words lately. Do the reps, you get the results. Don't do the reps, you don't get the results. I've said them to myself, my teammates, and my coaching clients. As regular readers know from my sidchas and standard procedures, I live them. When I search the web for them as a quote, I don't find them, so maybe I created the quote. They ring true, particularly based on the Martha Graham and Jocko Willink quotes I live by. Graham: The dancer is realistic. His craft teaches him to be. Either the foot is pointed or it is not. No amount of dreaming will point it for you. This requires discipline, not drill, not something imposed from without, but discipline imposed by…

0 Comments

If you claim to consent for someone else, you’re a tyrant

This nation's government says it's just only if based on the consent of the governed. Consider Cancer Alley. Nobody consents to being given cancer. Nobody consents to being born with a birth defect. Yet Cancer Alley and other sacrifice zones are growing. I don't deny that people can benefit from perks that come from activities that pollute and deplete, but as long as they pollute and deplete, they violate what makes government just. You might like the perks, but you can't consent for other people. There is a word for people who "consent" for others. They are tyrants. If you claim to consent for someone else, you're a tyrant. I'm not saying you're good or bad. You have your values. I'm only saying something as…

0 Comments

Solving environmental problems today by teaching kids is like fighting fascism in 1941 by teaching kids

Context: Remember the first time someone said you could undo the environmental harms of your flight by paying a few dollars for an "offset"? It seemed too good to be true, right? Thousands of dollars going to extract and burn jet fuel offset by a few dollars? It was too good to be true and you knew it. Nearly none of the projects achieved the effects they promoted. Nearly all would have happened anyway. The demand for something to work that was impossible led to fraud around the world, people offering bogus offsets. Fraudsters pocketed the money while people who wanted to help actually flying more---that is, destroying more people's life, liberty, and property without their consent---mistakenly believing they weren't. Sure, teaching kids about something…

0 Comments

End of content

No more pages to load