Freedom


How we act when at the top of a dominance hierarchy: Learning from Thomas Jefferson

I've written many times about Thomas Jefferson embodying American culture today. He said all the right things about freedom and liberty. He considered slavery wrong. He still practiced it. His rationalizations and justifications are ours. I link to a bunch of those posts at the bottom of this post. I recommend them. If you want to understand how you sound to someone who lives by values you likely say you do, like do unto others as you would have them do unto you, live and let live, leave it better than you found it, and love your neighbor as yourself, read Jefferson's rationalizations and justifications. You know they're bogus. He knew they were bogus. He just about said he knew he would go to hell…

0 Comments

More on “How the liberation of living more sustainably feels”

I have to add to what I wrote last month on How the liberation of living more sustainably feels. In that post, I wrote To describe what living more sustainably feels like, imagine one morning you walk out from your home and step into a puddle, drenching your feet. Imagine further that you’re in such a hurry that you don’t have time to change so you end up wearing wet socks the entire day. Living more sustainably is like taking off wet socks that have been making you miserable all day, the awareness of which you tried to repress but you never did. It’s like that but many times stronger. It feels like freedom and liberation. I left out scope and scale I left out…

0 Comments

I increasingly feel like I’m in Monticello listening to Thomas Jefferson

I feel increasingly like an abolitionist or anti-slavery politician around 1800 living in Monticello. Mainstream culture looks and sounds like Thomas Jefferson: He said some of the most important words in history on liberty and freedom. He knew how wrong slavery was. He knew owning people corrupted him. He knew he was violating his own values. Likewise, we all say we don't want to drive a system that hurts and kills people (in orders-of-magnitude greater numbers than slavery did in the US). We know we're violating our values. We know paying for gas, plastic, and services based on them cause death and suffering, which corrupts us. We know we're violating our values. Yet, like Jefferson not freeing his slaves, we don't stop driving today's system…

0 Comments

How easily industry can be corrupted, often willingly and enthusiastically

I've read several books on racism lately. One of them, I think The Myth of Race, remarked how American soldiers after D-Day found Nazi vehicles had GM and Ford engines in them. I found it hard to believe, but possible. I looked it up and found this 1998 Washington Post article, Ford and GM Scrutinized for Alleged Nazi Collaboration: When American GIs invaded Europe in June 1944, they did so in jeeps, trucks and tanks manufactured by the Big Three motor companies in one of the largest crash militarization programs ever undertaken. It came as an unpleasant surprise to discover that the enemy was also driving trucks manufactured by Ford and Opel---a 100 percent GM-owned subsidiary---and flying Opel-built warplanes. This part of the article was…

0 Comments

How the liberation of living more sustainably feels

Want to know what living more sustainably feels like? Our culture is so dependent and addicted to things like takeout, cars, and flying that pollution and depletion enable, we forget that using them destroys life, liberty, and property. We don't notice that our government benefits and grows in money and power from licensing and promoting one of its few core responsibilities nearly everyone agrees on. We don't notice that they have corrupted us from our deepest values, such as the Golden Rule, as far as I know found in every culture we've looked at. Living more sustainably brings mental freedom from the internal contradictions of living contrary to our values. Corruption doesn't feel good. I know from experience. I lived in accordance with mainstream culture…

0 Comments

A quarter million burpees

Regular readers know what a sidcha is and that my second daily habit that both became a sidcha and helped me conceive of the concept began with doing ten burpees a day. I think I started my burpee habit in early 2012. In time, that habit evolved into a twice-daily set of calisthenics. I agree that discipline equals freedom, so more than the sizeable gains of saving money, saving time, strength, balance, flexibility, mental acuity, cardiovascular health, self-awareness, humility, and all the other usual benefits of physical fitness, I've gained freedom, mainly mental. I haven't missed a day since I started. Since I do a fixed number, I don't have to keep track daily. I update a spreadsheet I created and it tells me how…

0 Comments

It’s not your job to end pollution and depletion. It was nobody’s job to end slavery or fight the Nazis either until it was too late. (Or maybe it’s everyone’s job)

Everybody acts like sustainability is someone else's job. Sure, they'll avoid straws or get triple pane windows on their third home, the one in Tuscany that they fly to a couple times a year (I sat next to someone at a dinner recently who was doing so), but actually changing culture? That's too much to ask of anyone. Everyone acts like it's not their job. Whatever their job is, they act like doing that work is all they can do. To do more outside what they get paid for would distract from them doing their job. And what job today doesn't rely on extraction, pollution, and devices made by coerced labor if not outright slavery? It was nobody's job to end slavery either Say you…

0 Comments

The necessity of the APPLE PIE Amendment

For those who haven't read Sustainability Simplified, one of the main things it builds to is something that I thought crazy when I first thought it. The idea is a constitutional amendment in the style of the thirteenth, but instead of banning slavery, two main clauses, both traditional, both Enlightendigenous. One protects life, liberty, and property when the threat to them came through the environment. The other disallowing making property out of nature unless you leave enough as good in common for others, quoting John Locke. I call it an APPLE PIE Amendment for reasons you have to read the book for. The more I thought about it, the less crazy it felt, no more than the thirteenth must have before its passage. Now I'm…

0 Comments

Signs you’re not traveling even if you go far

Travel used to mean something. You had to work to go somewhere. In many places you could find a different culture. Today, you just pay money and go from one airport to another. The concept that "it's the journey, not the destination" is over. For most people the journey is passive. Going across the world takes marginally more effort than going across town. I've written before that “Traveling” with roller suitcases isn’t what traveling used to be. Today, most places are just slightly different versions of the same global culture. Again, going across the world takes you to people little different than you can find across town, and I don't just mean in a place as diverse as New York City. Signs that your travel…

0 Comments

More cultural exchange because of not flying: plinking and target practice

I don't know your views on guns, but I value both exploring different cultures and not polluting, which destroys life, liberty, and property. When my friend invites me to go to target practice at his shooting range outside the city, I'm happy to explore a culture as different from Greenwich Village, NYU, and Columbia as most places on earth. Unlike nearly anyone I know, I find cultures as diverse as any without flying and polluting. Many people I know look the other way at polluting, depleting, and homogenizing other cultures. Flying detracts from the values traveling is supposed to deliver. This one remains a constitutional right too, and I only took commuter rail to meet my friend. I didn't have to work months to save…

0 Comments

Addiction by chance versus Addiction by Design with Intent

That something in poppy can be extracted into something that addicts (opiates), that fruit and grains can be fermented into something that addicts (alcohol), or smoking tobacco can addict, or that gambling addicts are all chance results from nature. People may have found ways to capitalize on and profit from that addiction, but no one created the effect. Evolution did. By contrast, we now know how to addict people to things like video games. We know how to make substances that addict and to lower the costs of making them. We know how to refine addictive things to make them yet more addictive. I see a major difference between the first type and the second. I'm starting to distinguish them by name: addiction by chance…

0 Comments

Why treat doof as second hand smoke

If an adult wants to smoke in their home, that's their business. If they give themselves lung cancer, that's their choice, assuming their sickness doesn't tax others who didn't choose. Likewise, if people want to consume doof, that's their business too. But if someone smokes where others who don't or can't consent to breathing that smoke, or if someone too young to know the long-term results of their choices smokes, then I consider a role of a government to protect the life, liberty, and property of those people who don't consent. Also, if smokers litter cigarette butts and packaging, I see it the responsibility of government to protect the rest of us from their destruction of our lives, liberty, and property. Likewise for doof. Unlike…

0 Comments

You are as much an expert in sustainability leadership as anyone, or can be

People seem to want to defer to "experts" in sustainability and sustainability leadership. Many people know about science, technology, economics, legislation, and places where we might apply sustainability, but nearly no one knows anything about leading people or cultures to enjoy living more sustainably. Telling people facts or what to do or cajoling or coercing them isn't leading them, yet it's what nearly everyone does. It doesn't work. It frustrates nearly everyone, at least as far as I can tell. I'm not complaining or judging. I'm just describing our culture. You are as much an expert in sustainability leadership as anyone, or can be. I'm not saying you're skilled at it, but whatever skills you have are as good as nearly anyone's. I'm also not…

0 Comments

Their conflict is with Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, and the Founding Fathers, not with me

People complain if we don't use energy sources like fossil fuels we'll collapse or return to the Stone Age. That's a failure of their imaginations, but more. Do we need to grow? Milton Friedman hardly promoted regulating markets. He said: “We have no desperate need to grow. We have a desperate desire to grow, and those are quite different. I believe that the level of growth in this country ought to be whatever people want it to be. If the people at large—if each and every person separately was satisfied with where he is and didn’t want to grow, fine. I have no objection. I don’t want to impose growth on anyone. I want people to be free to pursue their own objective.” Should we…

0 Comments

“These are the times that try men’s souls”

I confess I haven't read Thomas Paine's The American Crisis, but I'm working so much on opposing coercion and tyranny, I keep coming across him. I'm trying to learn more about the conditions that led to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Learning history is one thing. Getting inside the hearts and minds of the people acting is another. What values were they acting on or not? If you see pollution and depletion as destroying life, liberty, and property, then you see much of our culture as depriving people of freedom. It creates tyranny, what this country was founded to oppose, yet it's everywhere. It pervades so much, few have the insight, vision, or courage to oppose it. They benefit from it. With that…

0 Comments

Replacing “comfort and convenience” with “the perks of being at the top of a dominance hierarchy” or “the perks of being a tyrant”

Word choice matters. Why speak if you don't want to be understood? It's not their responsibility for me to be understood, even if I get mad at them for not understanding me. I recently wrote how I was Replacing "sustainability" with "not hurting people" and "polluting" with "hurting people" since "sustainability" is too abstract in many cases, as is the "environment." I'm not trying to help some abstract environment. I'm trying to help people and to alleviate their suffering. (I followed up with the post Corollaries to my recent post: Replacing “sustainability” with “not hurting people” and “polluting” with “hurting people”.) I'm experimenting with another change of word choice. People talk about comfort and convenience and juxtapose these things with struggle and challenge. We treat…

2 Comments

Honoring fallen auxiliary police officers

I'm approaching one year training for and participating in the NYPD auxiliary police program. I wrote earlier about mustering for the September 11 service. Tonight I walked in the annual memorial service for two auxiliary officers who were killed on duty on this day in 2007. I took this picture as we were starting. Here's a picture another auxiliary officer took from inside the group. I'm not sure if I'm in front of or behind the picture-taker, but one of those hats may be mine. As I've served more, I'm not learning as big things as fast. I've learned that a lot of police work includes standing around or waiting. Sometimes after standing at a post not doing much, when I walk away, I say…

0 Comments

Freedom or pollution. I would be nice to have both, but you can’t.

Abraham Lincoln talked about a house divided being unable to stand. A Constitution that protected freedom in one place and slavery in another contradicted itself. You can protect freedom only. You can protect slavery only. If you try to do both, that divided house cannot stand. Likewise, you can have a Constitution that protects your life, liberty, and property from me taking or destroying it without your consent. You can have a Constitution that permits me to pollute and deplete, which destroy life, liberty, and property. If you try to do both, that divided house cannot stand. I'm not just stating my opinion. I wish I were. It keeps becoming more clear to me that as long as we have a Constitution that contradicts itself…

0 Comments

Have you noticed that sanitation departments have become socialist, imperialist, and flagrant violators of the US Constitution’s original intent?

Once, all garbage biodegraded. All garbage would turn into food for something within time scales relevant to human lives. Not today. Plastic can take centuries to degrade, during which time they kill wildlife and poison us. Plenty of residue from our culture poisons more, like pesticides and home cleaning products. Our hunter-gatherer ancestors could just drop the parts of the fruit, vegetable, or animal they didn't want to eat on the ground and between the benign content of that part and the accommodating population density, their disposal caused no problems. At some point after we formed cities, we shifted to having others haul our trash away to put in big holes in the ground. The stuff might take longer to degrade, but it was farther…

0 Comments

Josh and Evelyn Go Live! … see our first live stream of a series on living joyfully sustainably

Living more sustainably isn't hard. Our human ancestors did it for 250,000 years. Our non-human ancestors did it for billions. Most life forms do, maybe all except we modern humans. Living more sustainably in a culture that for whatever lip service it falsely pays to sustainability rewards the opposite is hard. Then the problem is people---that is, social and emotional, not technical. After all, it costs less, requires less time, is more convenient, and helps poor people. The social problem is people who, like all addicts, confuse the need to feed their addiction with actual life needs. They believe living more sustainably costs more, takes more time, is less convenient, and hurts poor people. In my book I describe why addicts get it precisely wrong.…

0 Comments

Replacing “sustainability” with “not hurting people” and “polluting” with “hurting people”

I'm starting to replace "sustainability" with "not hurting people," sometimes adding "and wildlife." I'm not doing it across the board, but increasingly. I'm seeing how people respond. Likewise, instead of describing an activity as "polluting," to describe it as "hurting innocent people." For example: Instead of "I'm trying to live more sustainably": "I'm trying to hurt innocent people less." Instead of "I value the environment": "I value not hurting people." Instead of "Flying is for most people who fly their most polluting activity": "Flying is for most people who fly how they hurt innocent people most." Terms like "environment" and "sustainability" can be abstract. I'm not trying to protect or conserve something abstract in trying to live more sustainably. I'm trying to avoid hurting people,…

0 Comments

Why complaining about “private profit and public cost” misses the boat.

The difference between an externality and coercion. An externality is a cost imposed on someone else. A cost is something that if you pay for it, you undo the cost or make them whole. An example might be if in doing my work, I undo some of yours and it takes you an hour to redo it. You could in principle consent to the work if I compensated you enough for it. If I cause a child to be born with a birth defect, no amount of money can make up for it. No one can consent to be born with a birth defect. To call causing birth defects is a category error. Nobody would call murder an externality. No amount of many makes up…

0 Comments

Inspiring words of resolution from great historical figures to fight coercion and tyranny

It's nice to know about problems and people seem to like complaining about them, but these reactions don't compare with solving them. Acting takes resolution. Gandhi wasn't just thrown off a train. He resolved to fight the injustice. Some historical heroes who transformed cultures wrote their experiences of such moments of resolution. We can learn from them. I find their words inspirational. Robert Carter III Robert Carter III freed his slaves when his neighbors Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and James Madison didn't, showing that they could have. He wrote in his Deed of Gift (1791)---the document which implemented this freedom: "I have for some time past been convinced that to retain them in Slavery is contrary to the true Principles of Religion and Justice, and…

0 Comments

Hear me on the Power Hour from the Heritage Foundation

Jack Spencer has been a guest on my podcast three times. Now I've been on his, and I think you'll agree it was a fun, engaging conversation. I can't tell you how much I've learned from him. For one thing, when I started doing the Spodek Method with him on my podcast, I enjoyed his sharing about nature so much, I didn't get past the first couple steps. I had to keep listening to what he shared. Most people I know who call themselves environmentalist view Jack's employer, the Heritage Foundation, as the enemy or something like it. They would want to defeat it, not talk to them, and would view people in it with suspicion. Yet I found his appreciation for and love of…

0 Comments

End of content

No more pages to load