Nature

People freak out when the topic of population or overpopulation come out. Some people think humans have overpopulated the earth and risk pushing us into a population collapse. Others think humans may cause problems but we solve them too, so more humans means to them more solutions. They see the first group as anti-human. The first group sees the second as not understanding science. They don't want fewer humans. They want more humans, just not right now. I've been thinking about how to measure population in a way everyone would agree on. In physics, we learn to use proper units for everything. When people say iron is heavy, we get annoyed. Weight isn't what people mean when they say it's heavy. A pound of iron…

Want to know the reason I I wrote yesterday about how relying on solar power connects me to nature and makes me humble to it? Because we're approaching the winter solstice. Despite a PhD in astrophysics that included helping build a satellite still taking data in orbit, I'm learning more about astronomy and many other parts of nature today. I'm not yet at the level of ancient Babylonians or Mayans, but over the years I'm seeing more directly the angle of the sun changing, along with the length of the day, and the patterns of where shadows fall and move. These days I'm thinking about it not out of wonder, though. I'm thinking of it because it's getting colder and windier. Shorter days also mean…

So-called Christmas trees have nothing to do with Jesus being born in Bethlehem and everything to do with pagan holidays, as I write about every year, for example in You Don’t Need a “Christmas” Tree—a pagan tradition. A reminder of the waste you can avoid, and other posts. We changed traditions to this needless one of cutting down trees and dumping them into landfills. We can change from it. Here is my first sighting of trees cut down for nothing to do with Jesus's birth. Usually I take pictures of them being put out for the sanitation department to haul to landfills, an example of a socialized cost for private benefit. This one is of them being prepared for sale, wrapped in poisonous plastic. As…

A major point of my book Sustainability Simplified is that a culture being unsustainable means it is running out of something so must Revert to sustainability, Trade something it has in surplus with another culture that has a surplus of what it is running out of (in which case I consider them jointly a larger sustainable culture), or Take what it's running out of from another culture. There is a name for taking from another culture. It's imperialism. Taking their land is colonialism. You can oppose imperialism and colonialism all you want, if you live unsustainably, you're driving them both. You can blame governments or rulers for driving them, but they do it because the home market makes it profitable. If you live unsustainably, beyond…

One of the more common responses to my suggesting eight billion people live sustainably, along with governments and corporations, is to suggest thing after thing the other person thinks wouldn't work. "What about cars? How will people get around?" "What about family?" "But they won't be able to create energy." "What about police and ambulances?" The list of attempts to challenge sustainably goes on. They aren't being rational. They're just reacting to emotions of wanting to avoid changing, to avoid trying, to do anything besides keeping doing what they've been doing and expected to keep doing. Among other things, they hope to find holes in sustainability. If only they find an inconsistency in living sustainably they can not try. I did it. "A meteor the…