Pollution and Depletion


About the comments to yesterday’s NY Post article about not using air conditioning

The article I posted about yesterday in Read about me in today’s NY Post: “No AC? No sweat! Meet the New Yorkers sweltering through summer — by choice” has been up less than 24 hours, but it's trending enough to get a big picture on the front page, though featuring the other two people profiled. I guess I wasn't as photogenic. I included the scroll bar in the image below to show that while it earned a big picture, it wasn't near the top. Still it got plenty of comments, which showed trends typical of comments, though the Post tends to conservative politically and aggressive, which I enjoy. Let's start with the unsupportive comments Here are two common responses that liberal and progressive environmentalists have…

2 Comments

Read about me in today’s NY Post: “No AC? No sweat! Meet the New Yorkers sweltering through summer — by choice”

The New York Post interviewed and photographed me for a story on New Yorkers who don't use air conditioning: No AC? No sweat! Meet the New Yorkers sweltering through summer — by choice, written by Lauren Elkies Schram, photographed by Stefano Giovannini. [EDIT, after reading the article, read About the comments to yesterday’s NY Post article about not using air conditioning] The story begins: New York City has a cool class of rebels — those who elect to brave the crushing summer heat without air conditioning at home. It is a small, but mighty group that opts to use fans, take cold showers and work in cool alternate locations during the hot months. Now, following a dreary holiday weekend, temperatures are back on the rise…

0 Comments

Year 5, Day 1 with my apartment disconnected from the electric grid

I only wish I’d disconnected sooner. Not needing something means more freedom, especially not needing something that Violates the Declaration of Independence (for a government to be just requires the consent of the governed, which pollution and depletion violate) Violates the Constitution (pollution and depletion deprive people of life, liberty, and property without due process of law) Violates property rights as understood by the framers, ratifiers, and public (pollution and depletion do not leave enough as good in common for others) Good luck maintaining democracy without enforcing the minimum requirements for it. Good luck leaving at peace with yourself violating your values. I take for granted you value living in a democracy, not descending into civic disorder leading to tyranny, civil war (remember last time…

0 Comments

Should I fear posting concerns about artificial intelligence?

I'm posting more about artificial intelligence, maybe enough to make a category for it. I posted that I hesitated to post my last one with this explanation: "I held back on posting it because of the question in the last paragraph. I’m finishing the third volume of The Gulag Archipelago and studying the effects of dominance hierarchy, which artificial intelligence is forming. People who criticized Stalin didn’t fare well. Should we worry about criticizing the people and machines who may be at the top of a steepening dominance hierarchy?" I doubt I have to worry, but reflecting on something thoughtfully and calmly isn't worrying. Besides AI, I also post a lot about dominance hierarchies. They form when there is a necessary resource that can be…

0 Comments

Do you want to deprive others of free speech?

Do you want to live in a society where you can deprive others of free speech or freedom of the press? I wouldn't. I presume you value that your government protects your freedom of speech and the freedom of the press for that media you agree with. Can you imagine living under a government that didn't? I'm in the middle of The Gulag Archipelago. It gives some of the picture and it doesn't like desirable. It's tempting, is it not, to think sometimes, "As much as I value my freedom of speech, sometimes people say things I dislike so much that I'd like to be able to restrict theirs. Not always, of course, but sometimes." Or you learn what the other side's media tells them:…

0 Comments

If you can’t walk away, you aren’t free. Freedom requires not depleting nonrenewable resources.

If someone orders you to do something but you can walk away without risk or loss and they can't coerce or force you to do what they order, you're free and their orders are just words. Freedom means you can walk away. What if your life depends on resources others control, so that the only way you can access them is if they let you? Then you can't walk away. Are you then free? It doesn't look like it to me. What if a nation depends on resources others control, so that the only way it can access them is if those other let it? Then it can't walk away. Is it then free? It doesn't look like it to me. A post What We…

0 Comments

Why the government not enforcing the Constitution and Declaration makes avoiding polluting and depleting hard

Regular readers know how I bring my portable solar equipment to my building's roof or to the nearby park to charge. Since my sole apartment window faces nearly due south, I can charge through my window most of the year, however limited and blocked the view, but near the summer solstice the sun goes too high. Even though the hemisphere sees more direct sunlight for more hours each day, my apartment sees less. If I could just stick a small panel out my window facing up, I'd get all the power I need without the work of carrying my equipment up the stairs or out to the park. Countless apartments in the city and around the world already have air conditioners sticking out their windows.…

0 Comments

Parents just don’t understand

George Washington, Andrew Jackson, and Jesus Christ didn't have kids, but JD Vance said about "people without children," that "How does it make any sense that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?" I guess Vance isn't a fan of Washington or Christ, though he was referring at the time to Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and AOC as leaders of the Democrat party. If he disagrees with their politics, that's his prerogative, but why the venom against people without children? Why the claim that people without children are less connected to humanity's future? [EDIT: I had the idea to write this post months, maybe years ago. I kept not writing it because I wasn't sure it…

0 Comments

Wounded warriors, by Clint Eastwood, and us

Yesterday I posted a passage from Steven Pressfield's new book The Arcadian about how being induced to act against our values---being corrupted from our values---affects us, in Wounded Warriors, by Steven Pressfield, and Ourselves. Yesterday I quoted a scene from Steven's book where three warriors share the effects on their minds of their heroism. It began with what happened to their bodies, which seems the visible counterpart of what happens to their minds, not counting those who were killed and aren’t there to be seen or heard. The passage built up to the last paragraph, which described pissing, pickling, and kicking corpses to try to diminish what they'd done. The actions show what people do when we are corrupted from our values. Steven describes warriors…

0 Comments

Wounded Warriors, by Steven Pressfield, and Ourselves

I finished The Arcadian by podcast guest Steven Pressfield yesterday. I found the whole book gripping, but one passage stood out as relevant to my work and upcoming book. A big part of my upcoming book is what happens to us when we are induced to act against our values---that is, when we are corrupted from our values. We didn't ask to be born into a culture that makes it impossible to get past eating breakfast without hurting people---for example through plastic packaging and transporting food across continents when our ancestors just walked to it---and causing more of it---for example, by funding future extraction and lobbying for more---but we were. The result: we tell ourselves multiple times per day every day for decades whatever it…

0 Comments

So corrupt, integrity looks extreme

People call my attempt to pollute and deplete less "extreme." Let's consider the view behind this defense that to me feels like an attack. It comes from people living in a culture that induces us to act against our values. Most of us can't eat breakfast without hurting others, for example by funding production that funds fossil fuel extraction for the plastic and transport if you eat packaged food. I feel it too, though less for having acted I felt the personal responsibility that first week over a decade ago when I avoided packaged food and saw the shelf where I normally started shopping at the local market. I couldn't see actual food, only boxes, bags, jars, and cans. For all my advanced degrees and…

0 Comments

May Day / No Kings Garbage.

The other day I posted pictures of the needless garbage Democratic candidates send to my mailbox. They talk sustainability, but look at their action. You can see the pictures in Democrat Garbage: When Democrats Say They Value Sustainability, They Mean When It's Convenient For Themselves (Republicans Probably No Different). Am I unfairly judging them? On the contrary, the conflict is between their values and their actions. I didn't ask for them to send me garbage. I work to stop junk mail being sent to me. I hardly receive any now, but Democrats do it. Holding people accountable to their values helps them. It doesn't hurt them. Their garbage continued to arrive after the election. I put an image of more recent garbage of theirs at…

0 Comments
Clarifying what people get when they pollute and deplete less
A6FY1C Brent Delta North Sea

Clarifying what people get when they pollute and deplete less

What people get from polluting and depleting less: I used to tell people that they'd save money and time because they will. Nobody believes me. Nobody. They see buying coffee at Starbucks to go and ordering takeout as saving time, missing that those who do those things have the least time. Knowing your values so you can prioritize them and dismiss less valuable things (like takeout coffee and takeout) restores time and money. I first thought stopping things that cause pollution and depletion---particularly those that fund extraction of fossil fuels, uranium, and other nonrenewable resources---would bring deprivation and sacrifice. Now I see that many things I once thought necessary or unavoidable are unnecessary. In time and with hands-on practical experience they become repugnant and disgusting,…

0 Comments

Environmentalists rarely try to solve the problem

Fixing the results of a problem is not the same as stopping it from recurring and you rarely can undo all the problems, especially if you do it persistently. For example, exercising doesn't make up for an addiction to doof. Even if you burn off the calories, it doesn't fix the health problems or make back the wasted money. More importantly, since you keep consuming doof, you'll likely miss exercising sometimes. Relevant to polluting and depleting: plant all the trees you want. If our culture values affordable houses and food, when they want to chop your trees back down, they'll find a way to. I distinguish mopping up the mess from not causing it because I'm getting flooded with requests for people promoting stuff for…

0 Comments

Why do we fund our enemies by air conditioning the outdoors?

Find me a war where at least one side isn't partly funded by oil money. Find me a war that isn't threatening to expand at least regionally, maybe globally. Where is that oil money coming from? Who is helping raise fossil fuel prices, thereby increasing the resources and power of Putin and his peers? Look no further than this restaurant, running the air conditioning with the doors wide open, and all the people patronizing it. Also all its peer restaurants, stores with their doors open, etc, and all of us spending money with them. It's only April. The air outside is comfortable. Pictured below is total waste. Another view:

0 Comments

The Constitution has no extraneous protections.

I wouldn't want to live in a nation or world without freedom of speech, freedom of the press, protection of being tried twice for a crime, or any of the protections in the Constitution. I don't know anyone who would. All must enjoy the protections you do for it to work, even if you really want to deprive others of them It might be tempting to think it would be nice to enjoy freedom of speech or of the press for yourself but to be able to limit the speech or press of others, like your political enemies, but if you think about it enough, you conclude that you're better off with everyone enjoying all those freedoms. That is, you might be tempted to be…

0 Comments

Nonfood things I’ve bought this year

I don't like buying things that pollute and deplete. Other than food and building maintenance, I try to keep track of things I buy that are material or cause polluting and depleting. I haven't kept track of subway and bus fares, but I ride them a couple times a month. April 16: Yesterday I bought an envelope to send a tax form. It cost fifty cents plus four cents tax. I gave them sixty cents and let them keep the change. I probably could have bought a box of fifty for a not much more, but I rarely use envelopes. I bought a round-trip ticket on Amtrak to Harrisburg, where I'm leading a leadership talk today. To get from Harrisburg to the conference center, I'm…

0 Comments

Discipline Equals Freedom: Two years no hot showers

If you don't get that discipline creates freedom, this post will make no sense to you. If so, probably best not to read it. Regular readers know I found value in taking cold showers. Maybe five years ago, after watching podcast guest Joel Runyon's TEDx talk on cold showers then reading his conversation with his readers on his Cold Shower Therapy Guide, which I recommend, I experimented taking a cold shower. I learned a lot from the experience. It was December in New York City, and very cold, but very invigorating and any discomfort ended the moment I ended the shower. There was no risk of injury. I got most of the value I get from a workout or practicing anything challenging with no cost…

0 Comments

Democrat Garbage: When Democrats Say They Value Sustainability, They Mean When It’s Convenient For Themselves (Republicans Probably No Different)

Living in Greenwich Village means receiving tons of mailings from democratic politicians. For years I've contacted people and companies that spam me with paper mail. I've gotten it to near zero, except political mail. Any time there's an election, they send me tons of their polluting, depleting mailings, unsolicited, unwanted. I don't know how to stop it because it's different people each time. Here are a few pieces of pollution from my mailbox yesterday. Similar amounts have been showing up for years, none solicited. It's tempting to say it's just a piece of paper here and there. They chose to pollute and deplete. They are in their behavior opposing sustainability. They are exposing the actual problem: they feel what they are doing is worth the…

0 Comments

I Challenge You to Find an Environmentalist Who Doesn’t Argue Against Sustainability

I just returned from another event by environmentalists. As usual, they promote climate most, mainly through emissions, but also through ESG and DEI. As usual, they promote anything but sustainability. When they talked about circular economy stuff, they talk about mining waste streams, but not ending nonrenewable inputs. When they talk about plastic, they talk about increasing recycling rates, but not that its mere production creates pollution that we have no way of rending benign, not now nor in any plan on any meaningful level. You get the picture. They usually talk in bubbles that don't challenge that they lack a vision to reach sustainability. Many of their proposals don't help and often accelerate problems or at least distract from actually reaching sustainability by leading…

0 Comments

What’s with toothpaste globs in sinks and pointless hot water use?

Living in New York City means eventually many people will pass through my neighborhood so I host people for visits in my home a fair amount. Though I spend most of my time here and visitors average maybe a few hours a week, I think they cause more pollution and depletion in my apartment than I do. One big reason is that they use hot water for everything and heating water uses more energy than many things. How do I know? My faucet knobs are always to the right because I use only unheated water to cook, drink, brush my teeth with, and so on, but whenever someone visits, I find the knobs in the middle or hot end. Why does everyone---everyone---use warm or hot…

2 Comments

Unearned Power

After chopping down half a continent's forests, coal must have seemed like manna from heaven, and later oil, gas, and uranium. Bounty of nature. But you could see why they'd love it. It rewarded people for being smart, for being clever, and most of all for helping others. It enabled people to cross distances faster than ever, to build taller and stronger, to warm the cold, to cool the hot, and so on. I suspect that even as early as the beginning, say soon after Watt's steam engine around 1776, some may have already started suspecting that it might have been too good to be true. At first I doubt anyone couldn't see any meaningful problems. Sure, there was smoke in the air that was…

0 Comments

Did Paul Ehrlich Help or Hurt His Cause?

Paul Ehrlich died two weeks ago. I read The Population Bomb a while ago and heard him speak in many interviews. I recently listened again to a few recordings of his and read a few articles of him. In each he was speaking to people who liked him and agreed with him so he spoke freely. In each he called people who disagreed with him "idiots" or something like "people who can't count to twenty without taking their shoes off." He wasn't perfect. Nobody is, but though he acknowledged he was wrong on some points, he didn't take responsibility for mistakes. He just said that he would be right in the long run. He didn't acknowledge that he didn't take huge factors that would affect…

0 Comments

Year 11, day 1 no flying

I attended an event in midtown by Trump Plaza in midtown over the weekend. A friend who is very liberal said how uncomfortable the space made her feel. She also mentioned how she just got back from Mexico and planned to return there, as well as New Orleans, in the next few months. I didn't point out to her how much of the cost of her plane tickets is funding the lobbyists and industries that are driving the US government she is so uncomfortable with. I did start to speculate if there were places that made me uncomfortable. I thought about airports. It hit me that I've only been inside an airport once in the past ten years. A few years ago I met a…

0 Comments

Would you have acted in the gravest historical times?

People consistently say they don't do what they believe is right regarding pollution and depletion because it won't change the system. I point out that independent of what anyone else does, their personal pollution and depletion will hurt people who have not consented. They rarely even minimally decrease their pollution and depletion. I'm curious what people think they would have done under slavery, the Holocaust, Stalinism, or other dominance hierarchy. If you found yourself magically transported to being in the group that owned slaves in a slave culture---say to become a plantation owner in the US South---would you have freed your slaves even if you knew that nobody else would and your actions wouldn't change the system, but you would reduce the suffering of the…

0 Comments

End of content

No more pages to load